Again, it's just sad
I mean, someone ask Brian Connolly.what the heck is with the midget tossing? That's certainly not very sensitive. And even putting that aside - why the hell didn't I win? I mean - if the yardstick was really just a jab at folks that have more experience and success blogging than doing the professional flack routine - I've got them all whipped.
And, dear readers: in the future: clumsy threatening emails and amateurish "cease & desists" ought to be addressed to: me at mkrempasky -at- that google email service. It won't be taken seriously, but it will be graded for style points. And then promptly mocked. My general rules on this sort of thing are as follows:
Brian, Brian, Brian
Good grief, man. Jealousy, bitterness, incoherence. None of which are particularly becoming. Anarchy? You mean.like..um, Wikipedia? What in the world were those people thinking with the notion that if you let the public participate and lead the process you might actually create an authoritative reference point?
Kind of like open source software and the communities that organize around the principles of collaborative work towards large goals. The only major obstacle to such endeavors are manipulators and charlatans. Like people who would try to abuse, say, a software community by trying to insert themselves just enough into the development cycle to later lay a claim to the fruits of EVERYONE's labor. Wonder who would do that?
Cheers.